PROFESSIONAL TEXT IN THE FIELD OF ECOLOGY AS STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL UNITY

I. Voloshchuk, T. Boyko

Abstract


The new approaches in linguistics focused on textology outlines the necessity in linguistic study of professional text in the field of ecology from the point of text analysis as integral unity of semantically, grammatical and functional relations within one text system. The integrity of the text represents the result of retrospective or prospective communication with a specific purpose and function and responsible for the structural unity of text and expanding the idea of the text by traditional criteria of textuality. The criteria of textuality of professional text: cohesion, coherence, communicative intention, completeness, informativeness, contextuality and intertextuality as the ability of the text to be related to a specific type. Thus professional text, being the result of communicative activity, is a coherent, logically structured, complete, consists of comprehensive statements that describes the specific profession facility, is adequate for the communicative situation by correspondent language means and can be supplemented by visual means such as symbols, graphs, drawings.


Keywords


criteria of textuality; professional text; integral unity; contextuality and intertextuality

Full Text:

PDF

References


Dercach, N.О. (2011). Lingvo-stylystychny osoblyvosty suchasnogo anglomovnogo ecologichnogo dyscurcu [ Lingvo-Stylistic peculiarities of modern English ecological discourse ]. Visnyk Zhitomerskogo derzh. Universitetu im. І. Franka, 59, 182-185.

Ilchenko, O.M. (2016). The language of Science. Kyiv, Ukraine: Edelveis

Kovalchuk N.M. (2009). Semantichna typologiya anglomovnyh lexsichnyh odynyts terminologichnogo kharacteru u galuzy okhorony [Semantical typology of English lexical units having terminological character in environmental protection sphere]. Visnyk Kharkivskogo nats. Universitetu im. V.N.Karazina, 32, 76-82.

Leychik, V.M. (2006). Terminovedenye: Predmet, metody [Terminology: subject matter and methodology]. Мoscow, Russia: Progress .

Lotte, D.S.(2001). Osnovy postroeniy nauchno-tehnicheskoy terminologiy [The foundation of the scientific and technical terminology ]. Moscow, Russia: Knyga.

Mishchenko, А.L. (2013). Linguistika fakhovyh mov ta suchasna model naukovo-tekhnichnogo perekladu [Linguistics of professional languages and model of scientific and technical translation]. Vinytsa, Ukraine: Nova Knyga.

New Foundations for a Science of Text and Discourse. (1997). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.


GOST Style Citations


1. Деркач Н.О. Лінгво-стилістичні особливості сучасного англомовного екологічного дискурсу / Н. О. Деркач // Вісник Житомирського держ. Університету ім.І.Франка . – 2011. – № 59. – С. 182 – 185.

2. Ільченко О. М. Англійська мова науки / О.М.Ільченко. – К.: Едельвейс, 2016. – 317с.

3. Ковальчук Н..М.. Семантична типологія англомовних лексичних одиниць термінологічного характеру в галузі охороні довкілля / Н.M. Kовальчук // Вісник Харківського нац. Університету ім. В.Каразіна. – 2009. – № 32. – С.76-82.

4. Лейчик В.М. Терминоведение : Предмет, методы / В.М.Лейчик. – М.: Ком книга, 2006. – 256 с

5. Лотте Д.С. Основы построения научно-технической терминологии / Д.С.Лотте. – M: Kнига , 2001. – 198 с

6. Мищенко А.Л. Лінгвістика фахових мов та сучасна модель науково-технічного перекладу / А.Л. Міщенко. – Вінниця : Нова книга, 2013. – 448 с.

7. Основи наукового тексту та дискурсу. – New. Greenwich, CT: Ablex, 1997. 



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Journal of the National Technical University of Ukraine “KPI”: Philology and Educational Studies

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN 2410-8278 (Online), ISSN 2307-1591 (Print)