PROFESSIONAL TEXT IN THE FIELD OF ECOLOGY AS STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL UNITY

Authors

  • I. Voloshchuk National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”,, Ukraine
  • T. Boyko National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”,, Ukraine

Keywords:

criteria of textuality, professional text, integral unity, contextuality and intertextuality

Abstract

The new approaches in linguistics focused on textology outlines the necessity in linguistic study of professional text in the field of ecology from the point of text analysis as integral unity of semantically, grammatical and functional relations within one text system. The integrity of the text represents the result of retrospective or prospective communication with a specific purpose and function and responsible for the structural unity of text and expanding the idea of the text by traditional criteria of textuality. The criteria of textuality of professional text: cohesion, coherence, communicative intention, completeness, informativeness, contextuality and intertextuality as the ability of the text to be related to a specific type. Thus professional text, being the result of communicative activity, is a coherent, logically structured, complete, consists of comprehensive statements that describes the specific profession facility, is adequate for the communicative situation by correspondent language means and can be supplemented by visual means such as symbols, graphs, drawings.

References

Dercach, N.О. (2011). Lingvo-stylystychny osoblyvosty suchasnogo anglomovnogo ecologichnogo dyscurcu [ Lingvo-Stylistic peculiarities of modern English ecological discourse ]. Visnyk Zhitomerskogo derzh. Universitetu im. І. Franka, 59, 182-185.

Ilchenko, O.M. (2016). The language of Science. Kyiv, Ukraine: Edelveis

Kovalchuk N.M. (2009). Semantichna typologiya anglomovnyh lexsichnyh odynyts terminologichnogo kharacteru u galuzy okhorony [Semantical typology of English lexical units having terminological character in environmental protection sphere]. Visnyk Kharkivskogo nats. Universitetu im. V.N.Karazina, 32, 76-82.

Leychik, V.M. (2006). Terminovedenye: Predmet, metody [Terminology: subject matter and methodology]. Мoscow, Russia: Progress .

Lotte, D.S.(2001). Osnovy postroeniy nauchno-tehnicheskoy terminologiy [The foundation of the scientific and technical terminology ]. Moscow, Russia: Knyga.

Mishchenko, А.L. (2013). Linguistika fakhovyh mov ta suchasna model naukovo-tekhnichnogo perekladu [Linguistics of professional languages and model of scientific and technical translation]. Vinytsa, Ukraine: Nova Knyga.

New Foundations for a Science of Text and Discourse. (1997). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.

Downloads

Issue

Section

Philology