Specificity of Language Means and Organization of the Semantic Space of the Suggestive Discourse

Authors

  • М. А. Zaitseva Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Ukraine
  • I. P. Lypko Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, Ukraine

Keywords:

suggestive discourse, linguistic means, the organization of semantic space, extra-linguistic factors

Abstract

 In the article the authors analyze the phenomenon of suggestive discourse on the material of the texts of court speeches. The authors consider the phenomenon of suggestion and suggestive discourse, which reflects the complex social processes that are occurring in modern society. Nowadays taking into consideration certain extralinguistic factors is an integral part of modern linguistic researches. It should be noted that in conditions of modern reality there is a shift from persuasion to influence during the speech act. Moreover, the word influence is the key one. In the suggestive discourse it is extra-linguistic factors that determine the choice of linguistic means. The authors pay attention to the fact that the addressee in the texts of court speeches uses mainly syntactic and stylistic linguistic means that have a strong suggestive effect. Some of them perform the function of visualizing the text and create a special rhythm of the text that also contributes to the intensification of suggestive effect. The speaker rarely uses adjectives and does not use emotionally charged adjectives. Regarding the organization of the semantic space of texts of court speeches, this text is presented by three semantic blocks: simple life, a conscious decision, and evidence

References

Bashkova, L. R. (2017). Klyuchevoy element v semanticheskoy strukture poeticheskogo teksta [A key element is in the semantic structure of poetic text]. Praga: Vědecko vydavatelské centrum “Sociosféra-CZ”.

Bahtin, М.М. (2000). Bahtin (pod maskoy) Freydizm. Formalnyiy metod v literaturovedenii. Marksizm i filosofiya yazyika. Stati [Bakhtin (under the mask) Freudianism. Formal method in literary criticism. Marxism and the philosophy of language. Articles]. Moscow, Russia: Labirint.

Volker, V. (2002). Proekt NLP: ishodnyiy kod [NLP project: source code]. Retrieved 03.11.2017, from https://royallib.com/book/volker_volfgang/proekt_nlp_ishodniy_kod.html

Kosmeda, T. A. (2014). Aktualni protsesi movlennya chi «movniy smak» ukraїnskoї suchasnostі [Actual processes of broadcasting or “language taste” of Ukrainian contemporaneity]. Naukovo-teoretychnyy zhurnal instytutu movoznavstva im. O.O. Potebni ta Ukrayins'koho movno-informatsiynoho fondu NAN Ukrayiny, 2, 44-55.

Kuznetsov, V. G. (2013). Lingvisticheskaya kontseptsiya Erika Byuissensa [Linguistic conception of Eric. Questions of linguistics]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya, 1, 115–125.

Lukin, V. A. (2003). Lingvo-semioticheskie svoystva hudozhestvennogo teksta, ego komponentyi i parametryi tipologicheskogo opredeleniya [Semi-otic properties of artistic text, his components and parameters of typology determination]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Orel, Russia.

Mihaylov, B. V. (2002). Psihoterapiya v obschesomaticheskoy meditsine: Klinicheskoe rukovodstvo [Psychotherapy in somatic medicine: Clinical Guide]. Kharkiv, Ukraine: Prapor.

Mshvidobadze, R. G. (1984). Raspoznavanie sotsialnyih ustanovok cherez grammaticheskie parametryi rechi [Recognition of social settings through grammatical parameters of speech]. Tbilisi, Georgia.

Sidorov, E. V. (2009). Ontologiya diskursa. Izd. 2-e. [Ontology of discourse. Ed. 2nd.]. Moscow, Russia: Knizhnyiy dom «Librokom».

Chernogrudova, E. P. (2008). Osnovyi rechevoy kommunikatsii: uchebnoe posobie [Fundamentals of Speech Communication: Textbook]. Moscow, Russia: Ekzamen.

Opening Statements. The Amadou Diallo Killing. Retrieved 03.11.2017, from criminaldefense.homestead.com/diallo.htm

Issue

Section

Philology