Parallelism in E.E. Cummings’ poetry: The research of foregrounding
Keywords:
foregroundin, stylistic analysis, linguistic parallelism, poetry, E. E. CummingsAbstract
Following the introduction of the ideas of Russian Formalists and Prague Structuralists, the foregrounding theory appeared as a new paradigm, based on linguistic models that claimed to provide insight into poetic technique and gain a grasp of the effects generated by this technique in the readers. Thus the article focuses on the analysis of stylistic tools to create the foregrounding effect in the poems by E. E. Cummings. The famous American poet, essayist, playwright and painter, he is famous for his very special style of writing and poetic innovations as he skilfully used various types of foregrounding in his poems, and therefore attracted scholarly attention. Hence, in this article the authors offer the outline of theoretical background of foregrounding research as they systematize different approaches to research in the area. On a practical note, the article details the issue of linguistic parallelism as a way to create the foregrounding effect. The authors hold that parallelism can occur at different language levels: morphological, phonological, syntactic, grammatical and lexical. In E.E. Cummings’s poems it is predominantly created by means of anaphora, epistrophe, asyndeton and parallel constructions per se and is in itself a powerful tool to generate an effect on readersReferences
Chesnokova, A. (2011). Jak vymirjaty vrazhennja vid poeziji abo Vstup do empirychnykh metodiv doslidzhennja u movoznavstvi [Measuring the Impression of Poetry: Introduction to Empirical Research Methods in Linguistics]. Kyjiv, Ukraine: Lenvit.
Shklovsky, V. (1929). O teorii prozy [Theory of Prose]. Retrieved from http://www.opojaz.ru/manifests/kakpriem.html
Chesnokova, A., & van Peer, W. (2016). Anyone Came to Live Here Some Time Ago: A Cognitive Semiotics Approach to Deviation as a Foregrounding Device. Versus: Quaderni di studi semiotici, 122, 5–22.
Fialho, O., Miall, D. S., & Zyngier, S. (2012). Experiencing or Interpreting Literature: Wording Instructions. In M. Burke (Ed.), Pedagogical Stylistics: Current Trends in Language, Literature and ELT (p. 58–75). New York: Continuum.
Halliday, M. A. K. (2006). Linguistic Studies of Text and Discourse. Soho: A&C Black.
Jakobson, R. (1988). Selected Writings, Vol. 8: Major Works. Retrieved from https://monoskop.org/images/d/db/Jakobson_Roman_Selected_Writings_Vol_8_Major_Works_1976-1980.pdf
Leech, G. N. (2008). Language in Literature: Style and Foregrounding. London: Longman.
Licciardi, B. (n.d.). What is Parallelism in Literature? Definition & Examples. Retrieved from http://study.com/academy/lesson/what-is-parallelism-in-literature-definition-examples.html
Miyata, M. (1981). Types of Linguistic Deviation in Oliver Twist. Shikoku: Bulletin of Shikoku Women’s University [in English].
Mukařovský, J. (1964). Standard Language and Poetic Language. Retrieved from http://:digilib.phil.muni.cz/bitstream/handle/11222.digilib/131565/Books_2010_2019_071-2014-1_7.pdf?sequence=1
Shibu, S. (1998). Analysis of Selected Stylistic Concepts and the Method of their Application in Teaching Literature in Under-graduate Classes in India. Kerala: Mahatma Gandhi University.
Van Peer, W., Viana, V., & Zynger, S. (2013). Literary Education and Digital Learning: Methods and Technologies for Humanities Studies. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 47(3), 120-121.
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of the National Technical University of Ukraine “KPI”: Philology and Educational Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.