HISTORICAL AND MODERN ASPECTS OF THE NOTION OF IDIOSTYLE IN LINGUSTIC STUDIES
Keywords:
idiostyle, individual style, picture of the world, conceptual, individual concepts, dominant and constant idiostyleAbstract
The article investigates theoretical foundations of the study of such a linguistic phenomenon as idiostyle and its interpretations. The topicality is determined by increasing interest among scholars in studying of individual peculiarities of the writer’s idiostyle. For this purpose, a number of definitions of the terms “style”, “idiostyle”, “individual style” are reviewed and analyzed. Idiostyle as a lingual-cognitive portrait of a writer is reflected in his texts and represented by the individual conceptualization of the world, being determined by the individual system of values. The author’s fictional conceptual system is referred to as the lingual-cognitive basis of his idiostyle. It consists of the thematically related literary concepts verbalized in creative works. In addition, the article dwells on the correlations between idiostyle and other notions such as a world view, individual author’s conceptual system, individual concepts, dominant and constant of idiostyle. Focusing on functional characteristics of James Joyce’s individual style of writing as well as their verbalization in the writer’s prose, this paper is an attempt of creating the portrait of the well-known representative of modernist literature and defining dominant features of his works.
References
Brandes, M. (1983). Stilistika nemeckogo jazyka. [Stylistics of the German language]. Moskow, Russia: VSh.
Vinogradov, V. (1963). Stilistika.Teorija pojeticheskoj rechi. Pojetika [Stylistics. The theory of poetic speech. Poetics]. Moskow, Russia: Nauka.
Holovchenko, N. (2011). Theoretical and methodological basis of the study of literary text intermsof style. Osvita rehionu. Politolohiia. Psykholohiia. Komunikatsi, 5, 88-94.
Gorbunova, N. (2004). Jazykotvorchestvo Dzh. Dzhojsa: slovoobrazovatel'nyj aspekt (naprimere romana “Uliss”).Candidate’s thesis. Moskow, Russia.
Grigorjev, V. (1983). Grammatika idiostilja [Idiostyle grammar]. Moskow, Russia: Nauka.
Doichyk, O. (2012). Idiostyl Dzhuliana Barnsa u linhvokontseptualnomu vymiri [The Idiostyle of Julian Barnes: A Linguo-Conceptual Perspective].Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis, Kharkiv national university named after V. N. Karazin, Ukraine.
Dolinin, K. (1978). Stilistika francuzskogo jazyka [Stylistics of the French language]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kharkiv, Ukraine.
Karasik, V. (2004). Jazykovojkrug. Lichnost’, koncepty, diskurs [Languagecircle. Personality, concepts, discouse]. Moskow, Russia:Gnozis.
Lesyn, V. & Pulynets, O. (1965). Slovnyk literaturoznavchykh terminiv[The dictionary of literature terms]. Kyiv, Ukraine: Radianska shkola.
Jarceva, V. (Ed.). (1990). Lingvisticheskij jenciklopedicheskij slovar'[Linguistic Encyclopedia]. Moskow, Russia: Sov. Encyclopedia.
Hromiak, R., Kovaliv, Yu.,Teremok, V. (2006). Literaturoznavchyi slovnyk-dovidnyk [Literature dictionary-encyclopedia] Kyiv, Ukraine: Akademiia.
Matsko, L. & Sydorenko, M (2003). Stylistyka ukrainskoi movy [Stylistics of the Ukrainian language]. Kyiv, Ukraine: Vyshchashkola.
Ponomariv, O. (1993). Stylistyka suchasnoi ukrainskoi movy [Stylistics of the modern Ukrainian language]. Kyiv, Ukraine: Lybid.
Fjodorov, A. (1971). Ocherki obshhej i sopostavitel'noj stilistiki [Essays on general and comparative stylistics]. Moskow, Russia: Vysshajashkola.
Vinogradov, V. (1990). Jazyk russkoj literatury v osveshhenii V.V. Vinogradova. [Russian literature language by V. Vinogradov]. Moskow, Russia: Nauka.
Jel’sberg, Ja. (1965). Individual'nye stili i voprosy ih istoriko-teoreticheskogo izuchenija. Teorija literatury: Osnovnye problemy v istoricheskom osveshhenii. Stil'. Proizvedenie. Literaturnoerazvitie[Unique style and questions of their theoretical and historical study. Theory of literature: basic issues in historically perspective. Style. Works. Literary Development . Moskow, Russia: Kn. 3.
Joyce, J. (1994). Dubliners. London, England: Flamingo.
Sandig, B. (Ed.). (1988). Stilistisch-rethorische Diskursanalyse. Tübingen, Germany: Narr Verlag.
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Journal of the National Technical University of Ukraine “KPI”: Philology and Educational Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.