LINGUISTIC ASPECTS OF LYING

D. S. Shchypachova

Abstract


The article discusses the range of problems associated with the study of the linguistic side of communicative phenomenon of lying, which, being not only the socio-psychological component of human life in society, but also a kind of code of any communication, in recent years has increasingly turned the focus of research interest in different fields – philosophy, sociology, psychology, law and linguistics. False statements are presented as a component of a refusal system to a partner of the communication in the right to receive full information.

The study of lying in the communication, of issues related to the theme of “linguistics of lying”, has become especially intense in recent years. Attention of researchers of lying shifted from the question of how lying is formed in the language to the question of how it functions in speech communication and whether it is possible to measure its main parameters.

This article focuses on three important aspects of communicative phenomenon of lying in determining its relationship with linguistic mechanisms and coding system of the meaning of the utterance, on the one hand, and cultural systems of action in society – on the other hand. Relevant questions are grouped around three themes: 1) linguistics, 2) semiotics, 3) culture.


Keywords


communicative phenomenon of lying; communication code; false statement; refusal system component; linguistics of lying; linguistic mechanisms; semiotics and culture

Full Text:

PDF

References


REFERENCES

Арутюнова Н.Д. Истина: фон и коннотации / Н. Д. Арутюнова // Логический анализ языка. Культурные концепты. – М.: Наука, 1991. – C.21-30.

Вайнрих Х. Лингвистика лжи / Х. Вайнрих // Язык и моделирование социального взаимодействия: Переводы / общ. ред. В.В.Петрова. – М.: Прогресс, 1987. – C.44-87

Гладких Н. В. Ложь и двусмысленность / Н. В. Гладких [Электронный ресурс]. – 2001. – Режим доступа: http://econom.nsc.ru/eco/arhiv

Дубровский Д.И. Полуправда: ее природа и социальные функции / Д. И. Дубровский // Философские науки. – 1990. – №11. – С.15-27.

Дюпра Ж. Ложь / Ж.Дюпра. Пер. с фран. П.С.Феокритова. – Саратов: «Новь», 1905. – 97с.

Закатов А. А. Ложь и борьба с нею / А.А.Закатов. – Волгоград: Ниж. – Волж. кн. изд-во, 1984. –192 с.

Знаков В. В. Послесловие. Западные и русские традиции в понимании лжи: размышления российского психолога над исследованиями Пола Экмана // Экман П. Психология лжи. – СПб.: Питер, 2009. – С. 243-266.

Красников М. А. Феномен лжи в межличностном общении / М. А. Красников // Общественные науки и современность. – 1999. – №2. – С.176-186.

Морозова Е. И. Лингвальные аспекты лжи как когнитивно-коммуникативного образования (на материале современного английского языка) / Е.И.Морозова. автореф. дисс. на соискание науч.степени докт. филол. наук. спец.: 10.02.04 / Е. И. Морозова. – Киев, 2008. – 35с.

Попчук О. М. Лингвистические и паралингвистические средства реализации ложного всказывания в акте коммуникации / О. М. Попчук: автореф. дис на соискание науч.степени канд. филол. наук.спец.10.02.21: – М., 2006. – 20с.

Шаховский В. И. Человек лгущий в реальной и художественной коммуникации / В.И.Шаховский // Человек в коммуникации: аспекты исследования. –Волгоград: Перемена, 2005. – С.173-204

Экман П. Психология лжи / П.Экман. – СПб.: Питер, 2000. – 272с.

REFERENCES

Arutjunova, N.I. (1991). Truth: background and connotation. Logical analysis of language. Cultural concepts, 21-30 [in Russian].

Vajnrih, H. (1987) Linguistics of lying. Language and social coordination modelling, 44-87 [in Russian].

Gladkih, N.V. (2001) Lying and ambiguity. Retrieved from http: econom.nsc.ru/eco/arhiv [in Russian]

Dubrovskij, D.I (1990). Half-truth: its nature and social functions. Philosophical sciences,11, 15-27 [in Russian].

Djupra, Zh. Lying./ Zh.Djupra. Trans. P.S. Feokritova. - Saratov, Russia: "Nov'", 1905. 97 p. [in Russian].

Zakatov, A.A. (1984). Lying and battle with it. Volgograd: Nizh.-Volzh, Russia. kn. izd-vo [in Russian].

Znakov, V.V. (2009). Afterwords. West and Russian traditions of lying comprehension: speculations of the Russian psychologist about the research of P. Ekman. In: Jekman P. Psihologija lzhi. SPb, , Russia: Piter [in Russian].

Krasnikov, M.A. (1999). Lying phenomenon in interindividual communication. Social sciences and modern world, 2, 176-186 [in Russian].

Morozova, E.I. (2008). Lingual aspects of lying as cognitive communicative phenomenon. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Kiev, Ukraine [in Russian].

Popchuk, O.M. (2006). Linguistic and paralinguistic means of realization of false statement in communication act: Extended abstract of Candidate’s thesis. Moscow, Russia [in Russian].

Shahovskij, V.I. (2004). Lying individual in real and fiction communication. In: Individual in communication: research aspects. Volgograd, Russia: Peremena, 2005 [in Russian].

Jekman, P. Psychology of lying. SPb, Russia: Piter [in Russian].


GOST Style Citations




Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2015 Journal of the National Technical University of Ukraine “KPI”: Philology and Educational Studies

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN 2410-8278 (Online), ISSN 2307-1591 (Print)